|
|
Document Library
 |
Policy development manual. A practical guide for officials responsible for the development and implementation of student-related access and diversity polices designed with 10 “tools” to help facilitate constructive campus-based dialogs and policy discussions. (Dec. 2009) |
 |
Policy brief. Summarizes major policy, legal and educational trends that college and university leaders should be aware of as they shape their institutional access and diversity policies. In collaboration with the American Council on Education (ACE). (Oct. 2009) |
 |
Report. Intended to help institutions in their efforts to lawfully achieve the educational benefits of diversity on their campuses through the use of a combination of objectively measurable race-neutral practices. (2008) |
 |
Policy paper. Provides practical guidance for public school districts stemming from U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education. Joint publication of the National School Boards Association and the College Board. (Sept. 2007) |
 |
Policy paper. Provides initial analysis of implications for postsecondary education in the Supreme Court's student assignment decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1. (July 2007) |
 |
Policy paper. Addresses questions regarding the future of race-conscious enrollment practices in higher education, and gives recommendations for action. (March 2007) |
 |
Report. A practical tool for higher education leaders that helps guide institutional decisions regarding diversity and the use of race and ethnicity in the admission selection process. (2006) |
 |
Policy manual. Provides a framework to help structure and inform institution-specific reviews of race- and ethnicity-conscious financial aid and scholarship policies. (2005) |
 |
Policy manual. Provides a tool to help college and university leaders understand how to structure their recruitment, outreach and retention programs in a manner that best achieves their diversity-related goals and minimizes legal risk. (2005) |
|
|
|